Sixteen months ago, the Supreme Court agreed to answer for the Ninth Circuit several questions regarding California Wage Orders that require the provision of suitable seating to employees. The case — Kilby v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. — has attracted seven different amicus curiae briefs. For the Supreme Court, however, apparently only eight is enough. On Wednesday, the court invited the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement to file an amicus curiae brief expressing its views on the Ninth Circuit’s questions.